Linear Equation and Linear Function: An Alternative Material Based on Visual Representation in Mathematics

  • Sugama Maskar Mathematics Education, Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Indonesia and Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Audra Pramitha Muslim Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia and Mathematics Education, Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
  • Darhim Darhim Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Tatang Herman Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nicky Dwi Puspaningtyas Mathematics Education, Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Indonesia
Keywords: Linear Equation, Linear Function, Mathematics, Visual Representation

Abstract

Linear equations and linear functions are important materials for students in developing their in-depth knowledge of arithmetic and algebra. However, there is a gap between potential development and actual development, which causes obstacles for students in understanding the concepts of these two materials. This gap results in other obstacles, including a fixed mindset in mathematics. The results of interviews with secondary school teachers in Indonesia also show that students have problems in number operations and motivation to learn mathematics. The design used in this study uses a descriptive qualitative study based on the results of literature studies, interviews with subject teachers, and the author's experience as an educator. This study also uses the theory of zone proximal development and mathematical mindset as a frame for preparing alternative material for equations and linear functions based on visual representations in mathematics. The results of this study contribute to providing alternative materials to reduce these barriers using a visual representation approach in mathematics. The author also provides alternative teaching arts to anticipate obstacles that arise when implementing mathematics material based on visual representation.

References

Alt, H. W. (2016). Linear functional analysis. An Application-oriented Introduction. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7280-2

B Pirie, S. E., & Martin, L. (1997). The equation, the whole equation and nothing but the equation! One approach to the teaching of linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003051829991

Boaler, J. (2022a). Seeing Is Achieving: The Importance of Fingers, Touch, and Visual Thinking to Mathematics Learners. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13593.003.0015

Boaler, J. (2022b). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-sg/Mathematical+Mindsets:+Unleashing+Students'+Potential+through+Creative+Mathematics,+Inspiring+Messages+and+Innovative+Teaching,+2nd+Edition-p-9781119823070

Boaler, J., Brown, K., LaMar, T., Leshin, M., & Selbach-Allen, M. (2022). Infusing Mindset through Mathematical Problem Solving and Collaboration: Studying the Impact of a Short College Intervention. Education Sciences, 12(10), 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100694

Boaler, J., Dieckmann, J. A., LaMar, T., Leshin, M., Selbach-Allen, M., & Pérez-Núñez, G. (2021, December). The transformative impact of a mathematical mindset experience taught at scale. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 784393). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.784393

Bosch, M., Hausberger, T., Hochmuth, R., Kondratieva, M., & Winsløw, C. (2021). External didactic transposition in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7(1), 140-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00132-7

Bostwick, K. C., Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., & Durksen, T. L. (2017). Students’ growth mindsets, goals, and academic outcomes in mathematics. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000287

Bruner, Jerome S., and Helen J. Kenney. "Representation and mathematics learning." Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 30.1 (1965): 50-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165708

Carmo, F. M. A. do, Faustino, J. A. de O., Lima, M. V. M. de, Felício, M. S. N. B., Borges Neto, H., & Cerqueira, G. S. (2020). The Didactic Contract from the Perspective of the Theory of Didactical Situations: An Integrative Review. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(7), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss7.2460

Cesaria, A. N. N. A., & Herman, T. A. T. A. N. G. (2019). Learning obstacle in geometry. Journal of engineering science and technology, 14(3), 1271-1280. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/V14Issue3.htm

Chevallard, Y. (1989, August). On didactic transposition theory: Some introductory notes. In Proceedings of the international symposium on selected domains of research and development in mathematics education (pp. 51-62). University of Bielefeld, Germany, and University of Bratislava, Slovakia. http://yves.chevallard.free.fr/spip/spip/article.php3?id_article=122

Christmas, D., Kudzai, C., & Josiah, M. (2013). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development theory: What are its implications for mathematical teaching. Greener Journal of social sciences, 3(7), 371-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.15580/GJSS.2013.7.052213632

Dong, L., Jia, X., & Fei, Y. (2023). How growth mindset influences mathematics achievements: A study of Chinese middle school students. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1148754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148754

Findell, B., Swafford, J., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822

Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for research in mathematics education, 28(5), 524-549. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.28.5.0524

Holmlund, A. (2024). How numbers influence students when solving linear equations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2024.2314067

Jaffe, E. (2020). Mindset in the classroom: Changing the way students see themselves in mathematics and beyond. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(5), 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1802215

Lombard, F., & Weiss, L. (2018). Can didactic transposition and popularization explain transformations of genetic knowledge from research to classroom?. Science & Education, 27, 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9977-8

Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111

Maskar, S., & Herman, T. (2024). The relation between teacher and students' mathematical mindsets to the student’s comprehension of mathematics concepts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 27-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp27-54

McNabb, B. (2021). A Fixed Mindset in Mathematics. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 13(2), 28-32. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1304392

Mengistie, S. M. (2020). Enhancing students’ understanding of linear equation with one variable through teaching. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 3(2), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v3i2.148

Nardi, E. (2014). Reflections on visualization in mathematics and in mathematics education. Mathematics & mathematics education: searching for common ground, 193-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7473-5_12

Nurlaily, V. A., Soegiyanto, H., & Usodo, B. (2019). Elementary School Teachers' Obstacles in the Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Model in Mathematics Learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.5386.229-238

Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation (s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into practice, 40(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002_6

Pierce, R., Stacey, K., & Bardini, C. (2010). Linear functions: teaching strategies and students' conceptions associated with y= mx+ c. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(3), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2010.486151

Podolskiy, A.I. (2012). Zone of Proximal Development. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_316

Sorvatzioti, D. F. (2012). The Socratic method of teaching in a multidisciplinary educational setting. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(5), 61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331385896_THE_SOCRATIC_METHOD_OF_TEACHING_IN_A_MULTIDISCIPLINARY_EDUCATIONAL_SETTING

Surya, E., Sabandar, J., Kusumah, Y. S., & Darhim, D. (2013). Improving of junior high school visual thinking representation ability in mathematical problem solving by CTL. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 113-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.568.113-126

Suryadi, D. (2010, November). Penelitian pembelajaran matematika untuk pembentukan karakter bangsa. In Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 2).

Van Garderen, D., Scheuermann, A., Poch, A., & Murray, M. M. (2018). Visual representation in mathematics: Special education teachers’ knowledge and emphasis for instruction. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416665448

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Published
2024-07-01