Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Several policies in the review of Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika):

  1. Each paper submitted will be reviewed by reviewers.
  2. The review process employs a Double-blind Review, ensuring that reviewers are unaware of the authors' identities, and authors do not know the identities of the reviewers.
  3. During the review process, reviewers consider the correspondence of the title, abstract, discussion (findings), and conclusions. Furthermore, reviewers also assess the novelty, scientific impact, and references utilized in the article

Reviewers' feedback will serve as a basis for the Editor to conclude:

  1. Accepted
  2. Revision Required
  3. Resubmit for Review
  4. Resubmit Elsewhere
  5. Rejected

An article is rejected for publication due to various considerations, including:

  1. The article does not fit within the journal's scope.
  2. The article does not adhere to the scientific journal's writing rules or author guidelines.
  3. Fundamental methodological errors.
  4. The authors refuse to implement suggested improvements provided by reviewers without logical reasoning.
  5. There are indications of plagiarism exceeding 25%.