Analisis Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills pada Mata Kuliah Matematika Lanjut
Abstract
This study aims to determine the quality of the assessment instrument based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) based on qualitative and quantitative analysis. The type of research is descriptive quantitative. This study involved 32 Mathematics Education students. The research instrument was in the form of a question review sheet and 16 multiple-choice items based on HOTS based on Bloom's taxonomy. The qualitative study covers aspects of content/material, construction, and language. While the quantitative analysis is based on the Classical Test Theory approach with the help of the ANATES version 4.0.9 program. Aspects that are analyzed quantitatively include validity, reliability, level of difficulty, discriminatory power, and distractor functions. The results showed that 1) the instrument reached the valid criteria from the results of qualitative and quantitative studies, 2) the reliability of the items reached 0.87 including very high criteria, 3) the discriminatory power of at least 22.22%, 4) the level of difficulty of the questions included 25% easy, 31.25% moderate, while 43.75% difficult, and 5) all distractors work well. This HOTS-based assessment instrument can be applied as an evaluation tool in familiarizing students with higher-order thinking.
References
Amelia, M. A. (2016). Analisis Soal Tes Hasil Belajar High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Matematika Materi Pecahan Untuk Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian (Edisi Khusus PGSD), 20(2), 123–131.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addision Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arif, M. (2014). Penerapan Aplikasi Anates Bentuk Soal Pilihan Ganda. Jurnal Ilmiah Educatic, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21107/edutic.v1i1.398
Arifin, Zaenal, & Retnawati, H. (2015). Analisis Instrumen Pengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) Matematika Siswa SMA. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY, 20, 783–790.
Arifin, Zainal. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Azwar, S. (1988). Sikap Manusia Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. California: Longman.
Friatma, A., & Anhar, A. (2019). Analysis of Validity, Reliability, Discrimination, Difficulty and Distraction Effectiveness in Learning Assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012063
Iskandar, A., & Rizal, M. (2017). Analisis Kualitas Soal di Perguruan Tinggi Berbasis Aplikasi TAP. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 12–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.15609
Jannah, R., Hidayat, D. N., Husna, N., & Khasbani, I. (2021). An item analysis on multiple-choice questions: a case of a junior high school English try-out test in Indonesia. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya, 15(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v15i1.8768
Jihad, A., & Haris, A. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.
Kemendikbud. (2019). Buku Penilaian Berorientasi Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kurniati, K., Kusumah, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Herman, T. (2015). Mathematical Critical Thingking Ability Through. IndoMS. J.M.E, 6(1), 53–62.
Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.
Masriyah, M. (1999). Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Suranaya: Unesa University Press.
Nuryadi, & Khuzaini, N. (2016). Evaluasi Hasil Dan Proses Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: PT Leutika Nouvalitera.
Oktarina, N., & Armariena, D. N. (2020). Analisis Soal Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) pada Tes Objektf Pilihan Ganda USBN Bahasa Indonesia SD/MI. Wahana Didaktika : Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 18(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.31851/wahanadidaktika.v18i2.4374
Plomp, T. (SLO), & Nieveen, N. (SLO). (2013). Educational Design Research. In Educational Design Research. Netherlands: SLO.
Purwanto, P. (2014). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017). Using Reliability and Item Analysis to Evaluate a Teacher-Developed Test in Educational Measurement and Evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301013
Sa’idah, N., Yulistianti, H. D., & Megawati, E. (2019). Analisis Instrumen Tes Higher Order Thinking Matematika SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.13.1.6619.41-54
Shidiq, A. S., Masykuri, M., & Susanti, E. (2015). Analisis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Menggunakan Instrumen Two-Tier Multiple Choice Pada Materi Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan Untuk Siswa Kelas Xi Sma N 1 Surakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, November, 159–166.
Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar (2 ed.). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suherman, Prananda, M. R., Proboningrum, D. I., Pratama, E. R., Laksono, P., & Amiruddin. (2020). Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) with Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model Assisted by Geogebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012027
Tangianu, F., Mazzone, A., Berti, F., Pinna, G., Bortolotti, I., Colombo, F., Nozzoli, C., La Regina, M., Greco, A., Filannino, C., Silingardi, M., & Nardi, R. (2018). Are multiple-choice questions a good tool for the assessment of clinical competence in Internal Medicine? Italian Journal of Medicine, 12(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2018.980
Warju, W., Ariyanto, S. R., Soeryanto, S., & Trisna, R. A. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Tipe HOTS pada Kompetensi Sistem Rem Di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 17(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v17i1.22914
