Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar, Sikap Sosial, dan Motivasi Belajar

  • Dedek Andrian Universitas Islam Riau
  • Astri Wahyuni Universitas Islam Riau
  • Syarul Ramadhan Universitas Islam Riau
  • Fini Rezy Enabela Novilanti Universitas Islam Riau
  • Zafrullah Universitas Islam Riau
Keywords: Learning Outcomes; Motivation; Attitude; STAD.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cooperative learning of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type in improving students’ learning outcomes, social attitudes,and students’ motivation. This is a quasi-experimental study using control and experimental classes. The research instruments used in this study were tests and questionnaires. The data were analyzed by using Multivariate Analysis of Variants (MANOVA). Theresult of the analysis showed that there was a significant influence between the experimental class with cooperative learning of STAD type and the control class with conventional learning viewed from the learning outcomes, social attitudes, and motivation of the students. These results can be seen from the statistical value of Hotelling's Trace which was smaller than 0.05. Cooperative learning simultaneously could improve learning outcomes, social attitudes, and learning motivation of students of SMAN 1 Tebing Tinggi.

References

Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2007). Effect of cooperative learning strategies on students' understanding of concepts in electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 349-373.Diambil darihttp://www.springerlink.com

Aryana, I, G, M, R., Idrus, A, A & Harjono, A. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif NHT dan STAD terhadap hasil belajar sikap siswa SMA Negeri 2 Gerung. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 10(2), 49-56. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v10i2.30

Ebrahim, A. (2012). The effect of cooperative learning strategies on elementary students’science achievement and social skills in Kuwait. InternationalJournal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 293-314.Diambil darihttp://www.springerlink.com

Harahap, N. (2013). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD terhadap hasil belajar kognitif, motivasi dan aktivitas belajar siswa pada konsep ekosistemdi MTSN Model Banda Aceh. Visipena Journal, 4(2).57-76.

Haris, I. N. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD terhadap sikap tanggung jawab. Biormatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1).

Hartono. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran, Pekanbaru: LSFK2P.

Igel, C., & Urquhart, V. (2012). Generation Z, meet cooperative learning: Properly implemented cooperative learning strategies can increase student engagement and achievement. Middle School Journal, 43(4), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2012.11461816

Isjoni, H. (2013). Cooperative learning efektifitas pembelajaran kelompok. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Khan, G.N., & Inamullah, H. M. (2011). Effect of student’s team achievement division (STAD) on academic achievement of students. Asian Social Science, 7(12), 211-215. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n12p211

Kolawole, E. B. (2008). Effects of competitive and cooperative learning strategies on academic performance of Nigerian students in mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 3(1), 033-037.Diambil dari http://www.academicjournals.org

Kristin, F. (2016). Efektivitas model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD ditinjau dari hasil belajar IPS siswa kelas 4 SD. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(2), 74-79.

Lamba, H. A. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif model STAD dan gaya kognitif terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa SMA. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(2), 122-128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jip.v13i2.55

Majoka, M. I., Dad, M. H., & Mahmood, T. (2010). Student team achievement division (STAD) as an active learning strategy: Empirical evidence from mathematics classroom. Journal of Education and Sociology, 4, 16-20.

Mukhtarodin., & Andrian, D. (2018). Desain pembelajaran dengan pendekatan kurikulum 2013. Nuhamedika: Yogyakarta.

Muldayanti, N. D. (2013). Pembelajaran biologi model STAD dan TGT ditinjau dari keingintahuan dan minat belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 12-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2504

Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi hasil belajar, Surakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.Risnawati. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran matematika,Pekanbaru: Suska Press.

Risnawati.,Andrian, D., Azmi, M. P., Amir, Z., & Nurdin, E. (2019). Development of a definition maps-based plane geometry module to improve the student teachers' mathematical reasoning ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12333a.

Sanjaya, W. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran beroreintasi standar proses pendidikan, Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.

Sudjana, N. (2014). Dasar-dasar proses belajar mengajar, Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Suyatno. (2009).Menjelajah pembelajaran inovatif, Jawa Timur: Masmedia Buana Pustaka.

Wakisman & Hamadi, M. (2003).Strategi mengajar dalam pelaksanaan proses belajar mengajar di sekolah, Pekanbaru: PT. Sutra Benta Perkasa.

Yeung, H. C. H. (2015). Literature review of the cooperative learning strategy-student team achievement division(STAD). International Journal of Education, 7(1), 29-43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ije.v7i1.6629

Published
2020-01-24